it sure is their fault for having a faulty tos, and if she followed the tos she did nothing wrong, blame the system not the user.
According to the tos she did nothing wrong. she said they were naked pics. she wasn't wearing any clothes in them. she was fully naked. just not fully exposed. ppl got bamboozled, were dumb and horny enough to believe she turned into a nudes-selling thot
Comment
F
Frantic23
Through their platform, OF endorses the scammer, becoming automatically co responsible for it. Since you they won't provide the model/celebrity/scammer address for directly suing them, they become proxies of the scammers.
Comment
F
Frantic23
and the 200$ photo? it was good?
Edit: nevermind it was in page 3... dude, she shows more in instagram lol
Edit: nevermind it was in page 3... dude, she shows more in instagram lol
Comment
Blah blah bla "I'm great. I'm going to single handed make everything alright etc."
Mainstream? What's here demographic? 15-to very early 20s or something?
I saw her on one of those Snapchat stories one day and didn't have a clue who she was.
I've only film I've seen of hers is The Babysitter, because I wanted to watch it anyway (don't think I'll etch the second one).
Delete if you want.
Comment
R
Ramita
tits or gtfo is finally relevant again
Comment
T
Tendempen007B
So she's trying to end the stigma against sex/sex workers by
making people pay up to 200 bucks to see the same shit they can see on her IG and lying about it
Okay.
Comment
U
User_2363
It’s because of her, OF limited the amount of funds a worker can make
Last edited by a moderator:
Comment
J
joestarktark
i mean boo hoo? now they cant make us pay 200+ for a 15 second BJ video
Comment