terrible edit haha, nipple placement is off.
Comment
first try ever ))
1
Comment
Even if it was 100% photoreal, it still won't have the same effect. Weird how we jack off not to the image, but the idea that it came straight from the source
2
Comments
Not even the fact that it came from the source or that she herself released them. Her first full uncensored nudes could also just be hacked from her phone and leaked by someone here and it would be just as exciting and amazing to most people. Just that you are fully aware and think about the entire time how it"s not the real deal or genuine article and just an aproximation or estimation of the dream.
commented
It can be weird if you think about it, all you really need is their head on a nude body and that's basically them naked, however it's not fappable unless you know it's legit. There's nothing special about nudity, but knowing that it's a specific persons actual legit body, it makes all the difference.
J
James W
5
Comments
Has anyone here checked out her new OF set? Is it really as lame and boring as the 2 preview pics and cringy tryhard descrption make it out to be?(Not asking for someone to buy it btw, but just an opinion or thoughts)
commented
The one where she's with another girl? Yeah she always pads her content with those descriptions. Kinda cringey I agree but she has to sell them that way because she doesn't do nudes.
Yeah! It also seems like since she did those censored nudes she has jeopardized and ruined all the excitement for all her future normal Lingerie or Bikini/Microkini sets now.
I think also the reason she sold them as a DM like a Limited-Edition is that it could turn away any newcomer fans from buying any of her "Normal" or past content catalog.
If she ever does it again as a permanent wall/feed post then it will absolutely cannibalize any and all of her other "lesser" content, and if she starts to do uncensored full nudes then even her censored nude content almost nobody will want to buy anymore.
She is basically just a few little lockpins or button presses away from opening a giant floodgate that she will never for the rest of her life ever be able to close again.
You're overthinking it, she's doing her own thing at her own pace. I doubt she cares about the thousands of people begging her to go topless.
Comment
3
Comments
Comment
S
saydeyirti
9
Comments
Thank you alot for posting this Jack!
WTF is that video though?
Am i dreaming things up or can you really see the all the shaving stubbles where her bush would be and also almost all of the goosebumps and brown skin around her butt crack and rear? This feels so unlike anything than what Taylor said she would ever want to show!
WTF is that video though?
Am i dreaming things up or can you really see the all the shaving stubbles where her bush would be and also almost all of the goosebumps and brown skin around her butt crack and rear? This feels so unlike anything than what Taylor said she would ever want to show!
Also unfortunately they're getting more and more expensive, starting to be regurlarly at least as much or often way more money than her full public feed sets!
Like this new one is 35 bucks for a single 3:40 video, or her censored 'nudes' was 45$ for 4 pics, versus her full sets are priced between 25$ to 35$ with way more content!
You can justify that by saying that regular posts are the standard weekly/monthly content that will take the Patreon's set place and you won't expect more for a long time.
The Dm's are the "special"/rare content you will see once a few times where maybe someday she will open up more.
I'm just miserable and useless because I am poor af and I can't contribute to share her things...but yes i also think it's a thin line to walk with prices.
The Dm's are the "special"/rare content you will see once a few times where maybe someday she will open up more.
I'm just miserable and useless because I am poor af and I can't contribute to share her things...but yes i also think it's a thin line to walk with prices.